Know which external signals deserve an internal decision.
Work through a curated, manually-reviewed reading list of authoritative source families, record your review locally, and send a relevant signal into Readiness Intelligence before it becomes a late implementation problem. This is a reading and tracking aid, not an automated feed — nothing here is monitored unless you open this page and check it yourself.
Local review progress0 of 5 reviewedStored only in this browser
Next recommended review27 October 2026Monthly cadence
Authoritative source monitor
Review the source, decide applicability, then control the impact.
The watchlist does not reinterpret requirements. It makes the monitoring and internal-decision step visible.
FDA
Study Data Technical Conformance Guide
The FDA page identifies the technical specifications document as current thinking and shows a June 12, 2026 update. Check whether revised recommendations affect dataset, metadata, reviewer-guide, validation, or package decisions.
Compare the controlled version used by the program.
Trace affected specifications and submission artifacts.
Record the applicability decision and effective timing.
Use the catalog and study-data resource hub to confirm which standards and versions are supported, required, or planned for the relevant submission context.
Confirm the study start and submission timing assumptions.
Separate a newly published version from an applicable version.
Align the decision across data, analysis, metadata, and publishing.
CDISC Controlled Terminology supplies codelists and values used with CDISC-defined data items. Review releases against sponsor-controlled terminology and the versions applicable to each study.
Identify added, changed, retired, or clarified terms.
Assess specifications, formats, datasets, metadata, and QC.
Avoid mixing production and QC terminology packages.
Annex 2 reached Step 4 in June 2026 and addresses GCP considerations for decentralized and pragmatic elements and real-world data. Assess operational relevance with Clinical, Data Management, Statistics, Safety, and governance functions.
Identify affected data sources and oversight controls.
Confirm traceability, reliability, and proportionality expectations.
Translate principles into sponsor-controlled procedures.
Monitor FDA notices and implementation material for eCTD requirements and v4.0 transition planning. Confirm regional and application-specific expectations before changing publishing or package workflows.
Assess sequence, metadata, validation, and publishing dependencies.